I’m Not a Lumberjack and I also’m Not Really OK; Angry Gambler Strikes Straight Back
Perhaps Not everyone carrying an axe is really a lumberjack
Ever seen a lumberjack in a casino? Not likely, since most lumberjacks do not generally carry their axes around with them on nights out. But two stories have popped up in the media showing that non-lumberjacks don’t necessarily stick to these rules.
Axing For Trouble
The first of those two tales of violence took place in a village bar in Fontaniva, Italy, in which a disgruntled gambler decided to exact his revenge on some naive slots machines after losing 5,000 euros (over $6,500) in 2 weeks.
The father of two, aged 48, was caught on CCTV cameras, footage of which has since stormed the media and video streaming sites, where audiences can watch the gambler smash up seven machines as nearby customers dive for cover.
After blowing off vapor, the machine hacker calmly strolls out of the bar, but perhaps not before giving a thumbs up towards the one-armed bandits. Either this is a sign of victory, or a show of friendship towards these specific machines. When dealing with crazy, interpretations are anyone’s guess.
The anger-released slot axe-murderer then waited calmly for arrest outside a nearby bar.
‘ He comes in here all the time to try out the machines,’ said who owns the bar, whom chose probably wisely- to keep nameless. ‘ He’s had some wins, but he spends a great deal of money. He is a laborer and only works any now and then.’ evidently, this is one worker whom keeps their equipment that is own handy.
‘He’s normally a tremendously man that is quiet. He just walked in extremely calmly with an axe and smashed all the machines. There had been several customers they were terrified,’ he added by them at the time and.
Because of this of his strangely calm yet violent outburst, the guy was sentenced for 6 months for criminal damage and control of an unpleasant weapon. But prison overcrowding got him off with nothing significantly more than a slap on the hand.
But Wait, There’s More…
The next of the two tales is really a bit more frightening, due to the fact axe was wielded not at the slots, but at a person in the employees at a shop that is betting the Welsh capital of Cardiff.
Police reported that the ‘particularly violent’ incident left the shop assistant at a Ladbrokes betting shop in Cardiff ‘in a situation of shock.’
Before raiding the till and making down with a few cash, one of three suspects in the robbery was seen wielding an axe over their head, threatening the Ladbrokes’ worker with injury or even worse if he don’t comply.
A police spokesperson investigating the crime said that two men, both ski that is wearing, entered the bookie’s shop at 9:30 pm on the nights the incident. One calmly stood guard at the doorway, while the other violently threatened the associate because of the tree-chopping gun.
The frightened shop assistant then handed over what police called a ‘quantity of money,’ therefore the men fled the scene in a getaway car driven by a suspect that is third.
Police are now appealing to the local public for information that could help apprehend the violent criminals, as unlike the Italian axe-wielder, they certainly did perhaps not wait calmly for arresting officers to show up on the scene.
Whose Casino Could It Be Anyway? Boston and Everett, Mass. Duke It Out
The battle continues over who gets to vote on Everett casino plan
While each and every of the three licensing battles for casino resort projects in Massachusetts has received its share of drama, none has proven more contentious than the fight on the casino slated to be located in the greater Boston area. Now, one Boston mayoral candidate is threatening a lawsuit over one such proposal that would put a casino within the neighboring town of Everett.
The legal choice is associated with the concept that neighboring communities is afflicted with casino projects, but won’t have a chance to vote on whether those casinos ought to be opened in the beginning. Suffolk District Attorney Daniel F. Conley, a candidate for mayor of Boston, has been one of the handful of prospects who have recommended that all of Boston should have the ability to vote on a casino that might be positioned in East Boston, for instance.
When it comes to your proposed Wynn casino task in Everett, Conley says that allowing only Everett residents to vote about it is unfair to the surrounding communities. If the East Boston proposal fail, then, he would file suit to stop the Everett casino based on the impact it would have on many Boston areas.
‘The Wynn proposal had been voted…on in only one community,’ Conley said throughout a press conference at City Hall Plaza, ‘while residents and businesses from Charlestown to Somerville and beyond will keep its traffic, economic, and burdens that are social get none of the proposed benefits.’
Based on the state laws that produced the chance for three new casinos in Massachusetts, only communities hosting casinos actually get a vote on whether or not allowing the projects to be built. However, casino developers are required to negotiate payment, with arbitration needed if the gambling enterprises and regional governments can’t come to a resolution on their own.
Conley has proposed having a path that is not really outlined in the 2011 casino law regarding the East Boston casino proposal, one that’s being manufactured by Caesars Entertainment and Suffolk Downs. He could have the entire city of Boston vote on whether to approve the proposal, while still giving East Boston veto power on the vote that is entire. The casino would have to pass votes in both East Boston alone and across the entire city in order to be approved in other words.
Yay or Nay?
While Conley has not specified whether or not he supports the East Boston casino proposal, a Boston world survey discovered that six for the eight mayoral candidates who answered that question had been in support of it, with only two coming casinopokies777.com out against it (with Conley and an added candidate not answering the question). Meanwhile, four of ten candidates supported allowing the entire town to vote on the casino, while six favored limiting the vote to just East Boston. Another poll of Boston residents found that 44% had been and only the casino, while 37% opposed it.
Even when voters return these proposals, just one will ultimately be chosen by the state due to the fact site that is future of casino in the Boston area. Along side the Everett and East Boston casino plans, there’s also a contending proposal from Crossroads Massachusetts to place a casino in Milford.
Labour MP Disses Sports Books, Takes Donation from Retired Bookie CEO
Chuka Umunna, taken up to task for accepting donation
Chuka Umunna, cited as the rising star of the UK’s Labour Party who has publicly announced his discontent towards the bookmaking industry got his own hand caught in the recreations book cookie jar after accepting a donation of £20,000 (more than $30,000) from the retired premier recreations betting company CEO.
Slaps Bookies While Accepting Donation
As a wagering shop critic who has publicly decried the number of betting shops, Umunna nonetheless accepted the big contribution from chairman emeritus of the Gala Coral Group, Neil Goulden, causing members of the Conservative Party to call the shadow business secretary out, claiming Umunna is guilty of adopting double requirements.
Since Gala Coral Group is certainly one for the largest bookies in Britain and accounts for the large number of gambling outlets, with 1,800 bookies throughout the united states- it just didn’t really read well.
Umunna has even attacked the industry directly with a campaign aimed at reducing the spread of bookies and betting shops in the local roads of his south London Streatham constituency, and went as far as to promise ‘new powers to get a handle on the number of betting shops.’
‘I understand there was concern that is huge some streets in our area are steadily replenishing with betting shops and cash advance organizations that take advantage of our community, as opposed to help us,’ wrote Umunna in a report to local voters earlier this year.
‘ Can anyone really credibly ever believe anything Chuka Umunna states?’ questioned Tory Party vice-chairman Bob Neill. ‘He says something in public and does another behind closed doors. Their hypocrisy appears to be limitless.’ And that is very unusual for the politician.
Spared for a Technicality
Nonetheless, fighting back the corner of this Labour Party MP, a representative for Umunna reported that ‘this contribution was made by an individual Labour Party supporter in a individual capacity, and was accepted in accordance using the guidelines and properly declared.’
Officially, the donation from Goulden was registered as being made ‘to support the office of Chuka Umunna in his capability as Shadow Secretary of State for Business, and for staffing,’ so it can officially pass as legitimate.
And even though Goulden is not mind of the Gala Coral Group of operations, the ten years he spent as managing director, chief executive and chairman of the group implies that he still provides consultancy services and chairs the Responsible Gaming Trust.
Whether it is a donation that is completely innocent not, and whether or not the Conservative Party that are searching to destroy the promotion of a rival MP by claiming hypocrisy, Umunna was still a bit red-faced when the news broke, especially after taking such a hard stance against the spread of the industry in his local constituency.
‘ The only thing we know he really believes is that the capital is full of ‘trash’ and ‘C-list’ wannabes,’ advertised Bob Neill.
Umunna, who is thought to be considered a future Labour Party leader, has already experienced his fair share of embarrassment as earlier this year their workplace was accused of modifying his Wikipedia page to show evaluations between himself and Barack Obama.